Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2021-05-18 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2021-05-18 House Journal Page 1162 HB 102 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the May 17 calendar (page 1123), was read the third time: HOUSE BILL NO. 102 "An Act relating to the state insurance catastrophe reserve account; and providing for an effective date." Representative Tilton moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 102 be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There was objection. The question being: "Shall HB 102 be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 102 Third Reading Return to Second for Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 21 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Patkotak, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Absent: Claman, Schrage And so, HB 102 was returned to second reading. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 2, following line 8: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 3. AS 37.05.289 is amended by adding a new subsection to read: (e) Nothing in this section creates a dedicated fund." 2021-05-18 House Journal Page 1163 Renumber the following bill section accordingly. Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Kreiss-Tomkins objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 102 Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Carpenter, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kurka, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rauscher Nays: Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Merrick, Ortiz, Patkotak, Rasmussen, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Absent: Claman And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. HB 102 was automatically in third reading. The question being: "ShallHB 102 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 102 Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 39 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Patkotak, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky 2021-05-18 House Journal Page 1164 Absent: Claman And so, HB 102 passed the House. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HB 102 was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.